1 Stage
Objective
Ordenar proyectos reales y validar el método en campo, aportando certidumbre sin prometer obra propia. Traducimos el diseño en un marco operativo: criterios, reglas e interfaces que permitan comparar ofertas, planificar con datos y reducir incertidumbre de plazo, coste y huella. El resultado es un proyecto preparado para licitar y pilotar con industriales.
What we do
We work from preconstruction: we review drawings/models, normalize data, and define DfMA from the outset (modularization, typologies, connection points). We set the BEP and fit-for-purpose standards, coordinate models, and link decisions to LCA/EPDs where they impact materials. We conclude with tightly scoped pilots alongside partners to verify tolerances, logistics, and small-scale assembly before scaling up.
Deliverables
-
BEP y modelo federado con nomenclaturas y parámetros normalizados.
-
Layouts y tipologías con reglas de modulación e interfaces documentadas.
-
BOM enlazada al modelo, criterios de unión y secuencias base (ensamblaje y logística).
-
Toolkit básico de automatización (generadores/checkers), plantillas y informe de lecciones aprendidas.
6-8 Weeks. Ready-to-Bid Package (RFP)
Within a limited timeframe, we finalized criteria, layouts, BOMs, interfaces, and sequences to solicit comparable bids. This speeds up purchasing, reduces back-and-forth with suppliers, and allows pilots to be launched without redoing documentation.
≥70% of traceable scope (BOM/IFC, rules and interfaces)
At least seven out of ten critical components are identified with IDs, linked to the BOM and verified IFC, and their interfaces are defined. This way, purchasing, planning, and change control work on the same information, minimizing ambiguities.
–30–50% part variants (more repeatability)
We reduced the number of unnecessary typologies and variations, preserving the project's identity. Fewer variants mean fewer errors, better negotiations with suppliers, more predictable assembly, and cleaner logistics.
1–2 closed pilots with industrials
We select specific areas (e.g., panelized façades, prefabricated cores, or CLT/SFS connections) and run pilot projects with partners. We measure assembly, tolerances, and actual costs, and generate a playbook for safe repetition and scaling.
Stage 2
Aim
Convert the method into internal products and consolidate a stable network of partners (manufacturing and assembly) to move from specific cases to repeatability without promising in-house work.
What we do
We build component libraries (facades, lightweight/CLT structures, humid interiors), define system rules and interfaces with tolerances, and package maintainable automation (generation, verification, exports). We secure framework agreements with manufacturers, establish QA/QC protocols, and provide a training plan for teams and partners.
Deliverables
Libraries (2–3) with rules, binding details, and operable documentation.
DfMA Playbooks by system: assembly, logistics, security and control.
Parametric Toolkit v1 (generators, checkers, extractors, CNC/IFC exports).
Framework agreements with 3–5 partners + capability matrix and SLA.
+25–40% · Assembly efficiency
We increase square meters per day (or modules per day) thanks to planned sequences, construction layout, and secure logistics with partners. This is a direct indicator of productivity that reduces schedules and indirect costs.
–40–60% · Rework
under construction
Fewer corrections and downtimes due to defined tolerances, QA/QC based on the model and method sheets. Impact on quality, safety, and developer/industrial satisfaction.
100% · Critical components with traceability (BOM/IFC)
Each key part has a unique ID, is linked to the BOM and has been verified by IFC, with a change history. This serves as a basis for purchasing, logistics, and version control.
12–20 · Standardized interfaces per system
Joints, anchors, and connection points with documented tolerances and protocols for repeatability without surprises and facilitating multi-partner integration.
Stage 3
Aim
Launch the beta platform that connects design, components, and manufacturing: a Construction OS that automates deliverables and orchestrates the supply chain with open standards.
What we do
We develop APIs/plug-ins (Revit, Rhino/Grasshopper), rules engines, and generators/checkers (layouts, BOM, QA/QC) with CNC/CAM exports. We integrate with partner ERP/MES, incorporate LCA/EPD into decisions, and publish an open tolerance catalog/interface. We establish data governance (SLA, versioning, auditing).
Deliverables
Beta platform accessible to clients/partners with dashboards and pipelines.
SDK/Docs for integrating manufacturers and workshop validations.
Integrations with 10+ industrial partners (manufacturing/assembly).
3 approved system families (e.g. panelized façade, SFS/CLT, cores).
≥50% · Automated deliverables
Layouts, lists, and checklists generated by the platform with change control. Less manual input, more consistency and speed.
3 · Approved system families
A set of rules, interfaces, and tests that allow manufacturing and assembly with different partners while maintaining performance and safety.
Defined data SLA · Integrity >99%
Controlled update and versioning times (e.g., <24–48 h per cycle), with end-to-end traceability. Decide and manufacture based on reliable data.
>90% · Critical issues resolved before bidding
Major incidents closed in the pre-trial phase: reduces cost/time risk and improves bid competitiveness.
Stage 4
Objetivo
Scale execution via a network of partners with proprietary adaptive systems (not a closed catalog), certifications, and a licensing/royalty model. Internationalize while maintaining quality and traceability.
What we do
We sign multi-region agreements with manufacturers and installers, audit and certify processes (ISO/CE), and publish EPDs for key components. We deploy a marketplace for components/processes integrated into the platform and an industrial PMO service for developers (milestone orchestration, risks, and purchasing).
Entregables
Adaptive proprietary systems ready to manufacture with multiple partners.
Marketplace connected to the platform (components, processes, logistics).
Implementation playbooks by country/market and licensing scheme.
Reference cases with performance and footprint metrics.
–4–8 weeks · Until “water closure”
Industrialized envelopes and optimized sequences that shorten the path to structural protection. Direct impact on schedule risk.
≤ ±5% · Deviation from cost to tender
Closed scope, clear interfaces, and BOM traceability support bid accuracy and purchasing discipline.
–20–30% · Embedded footprint in key elements
Selection and design with LCA/EPD that reduces CO₂ and embodied energy without penalizing performance or budget.
NPS ≥ 60 · Promoters/partners
Customer and industrial satisfaction and recurrence; an indicator of model confidence and scalability.